Sarcastic: Let's see... going over my notes... I think I have enough here...
David: *Having finally landed* Hiya Sarcastic! What'cha doing?
Sarcastic: I have to give a fifteen minute long presentation for a College Teaching Class on a subject. I figured I'd do one about Mad Science.
David: ...Mad Science?
Sarcastic: Well yeah. I see enough of it. You learn to look for certain signs and cues and how to react to them properly. See, I've noticed that- *Unintelligible due to loud noises near David*
David: Er, I'm sorry. I missed that last part because the static reflux vents on my new cybernetic arm were clogged by debris and if I didn't clear them out quickly it would have exploded killing both of us. What were you saying?
Sarcastic: ...this is a case in point right here. Mind if I run my presentation by you to see if I'm solid?
David: Sure! I like helping!
Sarcastic: *Clears her throat* A-HEM. Welcome to "Understanding Mad Science: A Primer for Norms, Mundys, Sane Folks, and Henchpeople." In this 15 minute long presentation, I hope to cover the basics of recognizing Mad Scientists and how to properly and safely interact with them. Before we begin, I would like to state for the record that none of this is meant as a comprehensive guide to the subject; quite the opposite. Mad Scientists are fundamentally diverse and chaotic and tend to exceed or disobey structured definition. However, by keeping these guidelines in mind, you should be able to identify the "average" Mad Scientist and know how to avoid offending them or incurring their wrath or worse: Making a social faux pas that causes them to think you're asking to be experimented on.
David: Ok, good so far... *Sitting and listening helpfully!*
Sarcastic: Let's start with how to identify Mad Scientists and Prospective Mads. In my research I found a number of different methods that psychologists and behavioral scientists swear by, but by and large I couldn't seem to find any method that every authority on the subject agreed on. Some prefer the Offenheimer Method, of firing a shiny object through a sunbeam at high velocities while the test subject watches and observing their reaction. Other experts believe the best way of proof-positive identifying a Mad Scientist is the Sandusky Method, whereupon you leave the test subject in a room with a bunch of random sciency-junk and wait for ten minutes. Still others have put forward the thus-far untested Farnsworth Method, where you use high-powered and potentially cancerous brain scanners as well as a pair of forceps and a dentists' table to study the shape and electrical activity of the test subject's brain.
David: Wait, what was that about potential cancer? Are there crabs involved somehow?
Sarcastic: Quiet! But I discounted each of these methods because they failed to meet some basic criteria. None of them can be conducted without prior preparation, they all cannot be done without the subject being suspicious as to the nature of the test, and two of the three tend to leave smoking craters after being conducted. Instead, I prefer a much more simple and improvisational method. While it may not be as comprehensive, it is generally a good litmus test for common traits associated with Mad Science.
Sarcastic: This method, which I have dubbed "The Nerd Response", is simple. As the test subject to perform something technical or mathematical that is inherently simple, and observe to see if they begin to complicate it.
David: Wait... um, maybe I'm missing something, Sarc. But how does that even work? I don't quite understand.
Sarcastic: Well, maybe this would be a good time to give an example. Let's say I ask Dr. Geneve Beard to feed my friend Ryan's goldfish, which I have here. *Points at a goldfish tank on the table nearby* Your average joe would probably just take the feed seated conveniently next to the tank and sprinkle some in. Especially if they know very little about the care and raising of goldfish. A statistically likely, although not necessarily guaranteed response, from Dr. Geneve Beard might begin with her examining the food, noting that the nutritional level of the food is horrible for this specific subspecies of goldfish. This would then cause her to begin checking to see if the goldfish is malnourished, which may require her to temporarily remove it from the tank and move it to a facility where she has more access to tools and testing apparatuses. Apparati. However you pluralize that. In any event, from here her behavior would probably diverge depending on the state and condition of said goldfish, but it's a good example of how Mad Scientists in general tend to complicate things beyond what they need to. Hypothetically, of course.
David: I'm not sure I can believe that all Mad Scientists, or even most of us, do that.
Sarcastic: Wanna put it to the test? My car's been showing me the Check Engine light for the past two days and I was hoping to ask someone who knew machines to tell me what it means, and- *blinks as David runs off* Boss? BOSS! NO! PUT THE TIRE JACK DOWN! I WASN'T GOING TO SUGGEST WE TEST IT WITH YOU! I DON'T NEED APPENDAGES ADDED TO MY CAR!
(Want to see Sarcastic go further into her presentation about "Understanding Mad Scientists?" Volunteer your character in the MSW lounge or just heckle in character chat!)
_________________ We've learned a lot, but this still isn't going to be easy. But I don't think the elder star's confidence in us was misplaced. I know we can do this! We'll set things right! ...somehow.
"There is a fine line between a good King and a Despot. A King is best when His subjects barely realize that He exists. When His work is done and His will is fulfilled, they will say, 'We did it ourselves.'" -Xin Yun
|